Friday 23 September 2011

Day2; the judging of the social innovation competition!

Now where would you judge social innovation but in a 17th century church!

The judging panel

The church

There has been a star judging panel and presenters, including the vice President of the European Parliament. My good friend Oliver Rothschild has come over to join us, though he , like me , has been rather wilting in the heat.

Of course with the wonders of technology you are never far from the UK news and so spent some time talking to The Times on the disgraceful new development of the Desmond" health " lottery. He intends to only give 20p in the pound to health, whereas the national lottery, is giving 28p to good causes. So if peopole switch to Desmond from the national lottery charities will loose out. I agree with the smart quote from Nick wilkie of London youth that he is profiteering from the goodwill of the British people!

Health Lottery ‘profiteering on the back of public’s goodwill' - The Times

Charity leaders have criticised a new lottery being launched next week by Richard Desmond, the owner of Channel 5, for giving less to good causes than the National Lottery.
The new game, called the Health Lottery, will compete directly with the National Lottery. Mr Desmond plans to promote it heavily across his publications, including the Daily Express, Daily Star and OK! magazine. The draw will be shown at primetime on ITV1 and Channel 5 on Saturday nights, and the maximum prize is £100,000.
The Health Lottery will give 20.34p of each £1 ticket to good causes, just 0.34p above the legal minimum it is required to give as a “society lottery”, and it will not be required to pay lottery duty. The National Lottery, which is not a society lottery, gives 28p per £1, plus another 12p in lottery duty.
Camelot, which runs the National Lottery under licence, is permitted a maximum profit of 0.5p per £1 gambled. The Health Lottery, in which Mr Desmond is the sole investor, declined to say what level of profit it expected. In its instructions to retailers, the Health Lottery says: “When telling customers about the Health Lottery, remember the main features . . . Proceeds go to support local health-related good causes.”
If the Health Lottery meets its target of selling at least £250 million of tickets in the first year, it will give £20 million less to good causes than if the same sum had been spent on National Lottery tickets. Under the Gambling Act 2005, a society lottery can sell a maximum of £10 million of tickets a year. The Health Lottery has registered 51 society lotteries, giving it potential sales of £510 million.
While lotteries cannot be run for commercial gain, the Health Lottery can profit by acting as an “external lottery manager” for the society lotteries.
Sir Stephen Bubb, chief executive of the Association of Chief Executives of Voluntary Organisations, described the Health Lottery as “a pretty disgraceful development”, adding: “The Government needs to look at lottery regulations to ensure it’s made transparent to people who play that this new lottery is giving a lot less per £1 to good causes.”
Nick Wilkie, the chief executive of London Youth, a network of 400 youth organisations, said: “It seems to me that if one runs a lottery and gives away less to good causes than the National Lottery, then one is profiteering on the back of the British public’s goodwill.”
Martin Hall, the chief executive of the Health Lottery, said that he hoped to expand it into “a billion-pound business”. Mr Desmond has signed up more than 40,000 retailers to sell tickets for his Health Lottery — 12,000 more than the number of shops selling tickets for the National Lottery.
The maximum prize is £100,000, which is guaranteed for all five correct numbers. Three correct numbers wins £50 and four £500. Tickets go on sale on September 29.
Winning odds: 2 million to 1 to win the Health Lottery top prize of £100,000.
It is 14 million to 1 to win the Lotto top prize (shared, but usually several million pounds)

No comments: