Friday, 28 September 2012

Where is civil society?

The Korber Foundation is housed in a splendid building in the heart of the redeveloped Port area in Hamburg; a brilliant conference space which they use to promote debate and discussion about the role of civil society. 

One of the special aspects of this German Foundation is an interest in developments in civil society in the Anglo- Saxon world and its relevance in Germany. They run an annual conference and I'm going to be speaking here later. 



And the theme;  " Where is Civil Society; On the path to a new political understanding"

So we explore the role of third sector organisations in promoting a stronger "citizen society" (rather like that - so much stronger than civil society, especially when I like to think we shouldn't be civil when there is such injustice and incompetence around). Looking at getting more political in a culture where large charities are seen as more complicit with the State and largely uncritical of it. 

So the Foundation believes in encouraging more "political" action by civil society and one of the early discussions was about community organising!

A pretty stunning range of speakers; Prof Sievers from Stanford , Prof Leo Pinta one of the world experts on community organising and the great third sector guru, Prof Anheier of  Heidelberg University; a world centre of research on civil society. (And I should just mention Prof Anheier is speaking at our Acevo Annual Conference on Nov 29th. Book now!) As a mere Knight not a Prof I felt outgunned!

What was particularly interesting was the debate around the "independence" of the sector as opposed to its role in delivery , advocacy and development of government policy and action.

Prof Anheier was particularly provocative about the role of Foundations who he described as working in " non explosive " areas and not seeking challenge. He thought they needed to be involved in politically explosive areas! I thought this was rather pertinent to the UK.  How could we encourage our Foundations to be more explosive as opposed to project driven? Less safe?

Of course the role of the independence of the sector from  Government is an area of debate in the UK but the issue can be overplayed. The trick is to both work with Government and be critical of it. As Ed Miliband was fond of saying," bite the hand that feeds you ".

Its something Acevo has tried to exemplify even though that can be a tricky ride. I suspect the next 2 years of coalition government will get more problematic for our sector. So the debate in Germany about encouraging a more politically active sector is a crucial one , given their role in EU leadership.


Stephen Bubb

Thursday, 27 September 2012

Getting a grip

Here's a quote for all you third sector leaders facing increasing problems;

Voltaire: “Life is a shipwreck, but we must not forget to sing in the lifeboats".



And we see from the Kings Fund report that the health service is facing more funding problems. This illustrates the danger of a salami slicing approach to cuts. It is unacceptable for hospitals and managers to try to save money be limiting access to treatment or delaying it. Routinely hospitals are giving less priority to non emergency treatments like hip and knee replacements and hernias.  They cynically ignore provisions in the NHS constitution that give people a statutory right to access treatment after 18 weeks. 


In fact a radical restructuring of the service is needed and third sector organisations need to be demanding change. More resources out of hospitals and into prevention and community care. More diversity of provision. More choice and competition.  But I've banged on about this too often in these blogs! Still ,i will be making the same point to Jeremy Hunt when I see him shortly. 


And now , would you believe I'm off to Hamburg. I have to admit it was a pleasure to return home from a wet and windy Malmo late on Tuesday. My own bed. My dog. A cup of proper tea . Sure beats a wretched hotel with a gurgling radiator. And a day in the office! 


I  have been invited ro give a key note address at the conference of a big German Foundation ; they want me to talk about the role of the sector in helping develop Government policy and challenging Governments. The German third sector has less of a tradition of political engagement. I shall stir them up. A bit of agit prop and speaking truth to power. Our dual role of delivery and Challenge. 



Indeed the way things are going here with the coalition Government's lack of any coherent policy  on our sector as part of the answer to current economic and social challenges we will need a bit more speaking truth ......or singing it!

Stephen Bubb

Tuesday, 25 September 2012

Europe needs Capital!

So, maybe last week was communing with nature and wildlife. This week its Europe and the euclid AGM which this year is a 2 country affair; Denmark and Sweden!

Starting off in Copenhagen, in a rather cold and dilapidated warehouse which now hosts various social businesses : we sit around in our coats. But the interest of these euclid events is the chance to meet  with third sector experts from across Europe

It is clear that problems in accessing capital is a European wide problem.

 But there are also interesting initiatives to look at how to remedy the problem. In both Denmark and Sweden the Governments are developing social innovation strategies. We heard from Danish civil servants about how they want to spend 43m danish kroner on social businesses in a newly developed National Civil Society strategy. Yet when I asked if part would be loans they looked surprised. Yet I also met with Lars Johansen, CEO of the "Sociale Kapital Fond". and it does loans. Set up quite recently and backed by a charitable foundation it is beginning to make loans and is looking at developing bonds and equity investment. Very interested in the UK examples and experience. But I tell them the UK government appears to be turning its back on loans.  Despite evidence there is demand they wound up a brilliant loan-making programme in Futurebuilders.

Its clear that the EU Commission have woken up to social finance, " social business" and its potential. But its not at all clear they understand it and there is a danger that in discovering this new market they try and regulate and bureaucratise it. Like a kid with a new toy; they play with it and break it. However if we ensure proper input and involvement- as we are in an expert panel advising  Commissioner Barnier  We might get the EU behind an initiative to grow the social finance market?

But one warning, the EU official who was talking at the event said they wanted to develop one index to measure social impact. At one level this may be good; indeed there are at least 70 different measures of social impact so a more common guid would be good. But the EU has a habit of wanting bureaucratic conformity and in advocating or devising one model may stiffle different approaches and make loan funding more problematic. This will need watching. Just as we are opening up social finance we do not need Brussels regulation. Guidance yes . Advice yes. One size fits all no.

Then at 6pm we were all transported to Sweden. Over the new bridge that links Denmark and Sweden. To a reception at the University of Malmo. In a heated building. Though its a gale outside. And wet. And the hotel doesn't run to food or room service so I brave the elements to find an Irish bar and have a swedish steak!

Stephen Bubb



Monday, 24 September 2012

Better governance.

As Nick Young said at our recent SilverJubilee Lecture , whilst the sector has moved on on size and professionalism , little has changed in our governance arrangements.

It's time for action. Hodgson offers a way forward. Today we have submitted our views on the way forward to Nick Hurd MP.

They are based on a survey of our members. This showed that amongst charity leaders 52% feel they have difficulty re ruining trustees. 30% believe there are problems with Board performance. And 25% would like to review paying trustees.

It is clear the majority of boards do not want to consider paying trustees. But as we point out to Nick , the question is not do we pay trustees , but do we allow boards that want to pay trustees the power to do so. In our letter to Nick Hurd we also put forward proposals for safeguards if boards decide to pay trustees so as to avoid conflicts of interest.

(You can see both my letter and the survey here.
It's time for action Nick. Don't fudge this.

Friday, 21 September 2012

The Graph of Doom

Fascinating insight into the consequences of spending cuts from Dr. Phil Norrey the CEO of Devon County Council. He and I were sharing the platform at the Devon consortium of vcs in Exeter yesterday.
He was commenting on the fact that the turnover of the vcs in Devon is about the same as that of the County Council so we are a big player in the future of services and voice in Devon. But he went on to explain the dire consequences of spending cuts for the Council.
On current plans they need to cut spending by 50% in real terms in the next 7 years.

Devon has the forth highest concentration of people over 65 in the UK. He explained that on projections done by the Council on current Government spending plans , by 2019 the Council could only afford to provide services for the elderly. And bury waste. The so called " Graph of Doom". Frightening indeed.
This is a snapshot of the challenge facing all councils. Its an indication of the need for a radical overhaul of how we deliver health and social care for older people. Only by transferring resources from hospital to community and to prevention can we hope to cope.
Fascinating to hear the former care Minister Paul Birstow MP on "Today" talking about Treasury obstinacy in reforming social care and implementing Dilnot. As often the case HMT are unable to look long term.
But it is not just in health and social care we need change. And if you look services for children and young people, crime, jobs and regeneration, arts and culture part of the answer to the problem lies with the third sector.
At a strategic level Acevo has identified influencing debate and decisions on the next spending review as a priority. Over the next 2 years the Parties will be debating their manifestos. The Treasury will be developing their plans; and let's remember that over half of public spending is on health and welfare.
I enjoyed listening to Dr.Norrey. Not because of his ugly graph, but because he does see the importance of a strategic relationship with our sector. I'm going to be returning to talk to him and hid director's team about how we can help each other. I'm looking forward to that.



Stephen Bubb

Thursday, 20 September 2012

Building on our strengths!

A brilliant evening in Topsham on the mouth of the Exeter estuary in Devon. Staying in a small 16th century former coaching Inn.


Just look at the fantastic photos of one of our country's most beautiful spots




And good to meet up with my Devon cousins, Terence and Sandra. We grew up together in Kent but then my Uncle Francis moved to Devon so we lost a lot of contact. Really excellent to catch up tonight. Oh , and I discovered a local vineyard, Pebblebed, which produces a passable champagne!


And to continue the wildlife theme of this week I went to see the Bowling Green Marshes sanctuary belonging to that wonderful charity, the RSPB. This is an internationally renowned reserve, home to thousands of migratory wading birds in the winter. It's on the Exeter estuary and is a particularly beautiful spot. It reminds us of the importance of the work of charities like RSPB. The real defenders of our environment. And we will need to support them more as the Government tries to encroach on the green belt and dilute planning controls.

And then first thing off to the Exeter Football Club grounds for the AGM.

I said I'd tell you what you what I was going to say so here it is;

"No one can doubt the challenges our sector faces in speaking up for the marginalised and vulnerable and in delivering crucial services to communities and citizens. Recession and public spending cuts will remain a feature of public life for possibly a decade.

So our organisations and those we serve face some of the toughest tests in a generation. Now is the time for us to be united as a sector, not divided.

And yet our sector is divided. Two stereotypes are at play. Big charities are often seen as the third sector equivalent of Kraft (predatory, foreign, corporate) while small charities are stereotyped as the equivalent of the village shop in the League of Gentlemen (loud, incompetent, and ever so slightly weird). We need to acknowledge that both stereotypes are false, that both large and small organisations share common cause, that we are platoons in the same army. Division and argument do not help our beneficiaries.

Are we too quick to criticise the private sector for aggressive competition but too slow to recognise the value of partnership and cooperation between our own organisations? I know there is often talk of mergers in our sector but in my view more emphasis should be put on partnerships and alliances.

Every so often there are complaints about one organisation or another having " stolen" a contract. Arguments about unfair competition. Or unfair advantage. National bodies riding roughshod over local and well established organisations.

Of course there will always be controversy in this area. After all, we know the public sector is not very good at commissioning!

But if we put the interests of beneficiaries first then is it time for a more productive relationship between big and small, local and national?
We are a hugely diverse sector. Large local organisations. Small national ones. Large national bodies that are federated like Age UK and the Scouts. Community based, volunteer led bodies like the Kingsbridge amateur dramatic association whose summer production I enjoyed recently. Or Alzheimers who have worked closely with many other charities to develop a dementia alliance and strategy. Or RNIB who have worked across sight loss charities to develop a UK vision strategy. I know from my own experience the unique contribution that smaller locally based bodies can play, often in a way others cannot. That was why the Future Jobs Fund was so successful because it enabled small organisations to deliver jobs but not be saddled with the cumbersome necessities of public sector tendering. Scale can sometimes be important. But local knowledge and connections and "rootedness" in the community are a special prize that commissioners smother at their peril.

ACEVO is working to support partnership working between large and small organisations in our sector.

We have developed a toolkit to support consortia working. One of the organisations we pioneered this with was the Hammersmith CVS . We intend to significantly expand our support in this area over the next few years.

We are working to ensure national policies on commissioning recognise the particular nature of our sector and both encourage consortia working and do not strangle the role that local and community based organisations can play. So, for instance, ACEVO proposed and developed with DWP the code of conduct that governs welfare-to-work subcontracting, and then the Merlin Standard to give it some teeth. We need to continue strengthening these measures, and to ensure they are applied to other areas where subcontracting is set to become the norm, such as work with offenders.

ACEVO has a particular strength as a national body of leaders but we too need to work in partnership . So I am committed to developing the links and connections we need with NAVCA as the organisation that represents the CVS movement nationally. My top team and NAVCA will meet soon to talk about how we work better together.

I recognise there are some difficult issues, and we don't have all the answers here. But what seems certain to me is that the decade ahead requires us to bury the Kraft and League of Gentlemen stereotypes, and to collaborate more in the interests of our beneficiaries. The diversity of our sector is one of its strengths. We need to harness that strength rather than concentrating on our differences and our divisions."

And I was impressed that my friend Joe Irvin, Head of NAVCA was able to respond in a speech he gave to Bromley Community Links CVS ;

“The sector needs to stick together during the hard times. Reduced funding and competitive tendering will encourage division but turning against each other will do nothing for the individuals and communities we are here to help. The voluntary sector is stronger when it works together. And this is a message for NAVCA as well. We need to work together better with other national umbrella organisations, something I have made a priority since becoming Chief Executive in January. You may know we are looking into a merger with Community Matters. We are also talking with other national umbrella organisations to see how we can give the best possible support to the voluntary sector. One example of this is that we are meeting with ACEVO to explore how we can break down barriers between big and small charities.”

Now back to London I’d better show my face at the office or they might forget me. Difficult to conceive I know! But I can't quite put the travel bag away as it's the Euclid AGM next week in Copenhagen. It's great to see how Euclid has grown as a network of European third sector leaders. Modelled on the acevo concept that you need to develop Leaders of organisations if you want to develop civil society. My role as Secretary General is a great honour; particularly as this means the hard work is undertaken by the Director, Filippo Addarii and the Euclid team. I do the hold handing and diplomacy, and ensure thee strategic direction is correct (not am easy task in the European context).



Tuesday, 18 September 2012

Tywcross Zoo explored!

How unbelievable! Dining with the snow leopards. Not literally obviously but the splendid visitor centre and conference room where SIB were dining backs onto the snow leopard enclosure. There are only some 30 of these left in the world so the breeding programme here is essential. Indeed the chap you see here has 2 cubs! (Photo courtesy of Seb Elsworth ; on the iphone beats a blackberry on photos I find! )


The SIB away day was fascinating. What was revealing is that we have recently surveyed our investees and potential clients in terms of what. Appetite there is for loan finance and what plans they have to expand

188 organisations said they want to access loan finance to the tune of £343m. Yet there is practically no source of loan finance for them. Big unmet demand.

It really is time for the Cabinet Office and BIS to tackle this as part of a growth strategy. Whilst we have big society capital it is not yet in the position to make loans at this level. It has only just goi started on it investment strategy and we ought to be looking at how to plug the gap.

Obviously key to the discussions at our awayday was how we continue to invest in the growth of the third sector and in community enterprise. We celebrate 10 years of the Adventure Capital fund- the founding charity of the SIB group. We know there is appetite for loans and that an " engaged investor" approach works.

We were looking at how we lever more funds into the sector- for instance into youth unemployment work or health and social care integration.

But efficient chairmanship ensured we ended in time for a quick trip round the Zoo. A fantastic place. You must visit!