Our sector is supposed to pride itself on its ability to "speak truth to power" but frankly at the moment you would be hard pressed to see many examples of it.
I was proud to be part of the marvellous coalition of organisations that fought the Lobbying Act and made such a change to it. We also worked closely with our colleagues to fight the nonsense of the contract gagging clauses that still lurk around Rob Wilson's in tray. But the reality is that the real threat to the sector is our own self-censorship.
In the big debates of the moment you would need to look hard to find the charity leaders’ voice. On Brexit for example we took a craven line in the referendum debate and now are failing to effectively challenge the rise of xenophobia and hate crime. There are honourable exceptions of course, and the organisations promoting the cause of migrants and refugees is a great one, but by and large we have failed to come together to promote the tolerance and inclusivity that our sector espouses. Where for example was the voice of the sector denouncing the appalling "foreigner employees" speech of Amber Rudd?
Then we come to the horrendous crisis in our health and social care system. This strikes at the heart of where our sector has traditionally been active. Many, many third sector bodies are prominent in service delivery and advocacy. What is happening with the care of the frail elderly in hospitals around the country is scandalous. I have seen this at first hand with my father who has just spent over two months in hospital, where I have seen the strains on the system.
Chris Hopson, who speaks for NHS providers, has been a great example of someone prepared to tell the truth publicly about the crisis. On Monday we had Jeremy Hunt on the radio denying there is a problem and insisting that the planned cuts – so-called efficiency savings – will go ahead. This is disastrous, and anyone who knows what is happening in A&E or in the care system realises the need for more resources.
But where are the sector leaders in the media pointing out the crisis we face? Demanding action? There is a curious silence when we need a voice. Sometimes leaders think you work behind the scenes to get action and don't use the media. This is a wrong approach.
But there is a second and perhaps more fundamental reason why we need the media. A charity is not there simply to deliver a service or act as an agent of the State. Our beneficiaries want someone to champion them and articulate their concerns and demand change. They want to hear that. They want to see it. We are not simply there to work behind the scenes, necessary though that is as well, but to speak truth to power in a way that reassures our beneficiaries that we are on the case.
I'm afraid Theresa May is deeply unengaged in the current crisis and will not until she starts hearing us on Today or the front page of the Mail or top of the news. The NHS didn't do the pilots in A&E two years ago simply because I presented Government with a neat paper. They did it because they feared the damage a winter crisis could do. We have failed to capitalise on that. Never fall for the trap governments set when they tell you won't get anywhere if you go to the press. That secures compliance, not action.
I'm reflecting what I am seeing in the media and also on 15 years of working with politicians and getting results. When the Blair government wanted to make a major policy impact on charities, Number 10 was able to ignore many sector leaders. Those that were consulted – myself included – were those whose public backing was vital to success, and whose public opposition in the press could have been a serious thorn in the side. A charity leader needs to be in a position where they are too dangerous to ignore, and they can provide answers to sort major problems.
Bob Kerslake, former chief of the Home Civil Service, was quoted in Civil Society last week, pointing to the power of the sector and to remember we are more powerful than politicians. He sums up my position brilliantly:
"You have to stand apart and have an independent voice, and in my experience in government they respect those who stand up and challenge even if they don’t like it. The worst thing you can be seen to do is cower in front of government because, eventually, they will get you.”
As a local organisation, it can be easy to feel too small to make a difference. National organisations spend time lobbying central government and seem to have the contacts and capacity to raise the big issues, whereas many smaller organisations are currently struggling just to keep their heads above water.
However, as the leader of a small organisation (Dingley's Promise), I believe that we have a responsibility to make ourselves heard when there is an issue that will significantly affect the people we are working to support.
In our case, the introduction of 30 hours of childcare for working parents in September 2017 has been the trigger for us to raise our voice both to the local authorities, and also to central government - something we have never done before. As a provider of services to children with Special Education Needs and Disabilities (SEND) in the early years, we are raising concerns about how this new provision will affect sufficiency for children with SEND unless there is real investment from central government.
We have sent a briefing to our local MPs and local authorities so they are aware of the impact this could have, and have also sent a case study of how it will affect our provision to Mencap's national office so they can use facts about our experience on the ground to inform their lobbying efforts.
What is vital is that small local organisations make links with national organisations in raising awareness and lobbying, as this is how we can ensure we work together to raise one united voice - and a united voice will have more power than any individual organisation.
Post a Comment