I wonder how many papers will carry the report of the inquest into the tragic death of Olive Cook. Will the Daily Mail splash this on
its front pages?
This is what was said re charity fundraising,
"But her family insisted that - while the letters
and phone calls were intrusive - the charities were not to blame for Mrs
Cooke's death".
How does this square with media coverage and some
politicians comments? Of course it is
right to review how we fund-raise. And it is right to look particularly at how
outsourcing calls work as this is not always done to the highest ethical
standards. Bad fundraising practice harms all charities. ACEVO has asked its CEO members in the
fundraising charities to review what they are doing. That is a right thing to
do and it's the right time to do it. But some of the more OTT comments about a
"crisis" are wide of the mark. And it is perhaps questionable why
this issue is being pursued so vehemently in some papers. Surely it couldn't be
anything to do with duffing us up so we feel less able to be robust in our
campaigning? For us our guiding star
must be our beneficiaries and not the tabloid
press.
So yes, a good time to review and strengthen good
practice and root out bad. But let's also remember at this time less asking
means less giving and that harms our beneficiaries. Together with the IoF we
will be convening a meeting of leading fundraising charity CEOs and
Fundraising Directors to discuss all
this and look at what we need to do that secures the balance between effective
fundraising and meeting public concern over bad practise.
No comments:
Post a Comment